Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:54

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is one harsh truth about people's opinions on TXT?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Your Apple Watch Is About to Get a Pretty Cool New Ability - Yahoo
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why did Donald Trump and Melania Trump sleep in different rooms?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Big crowds gather in Hungarian capital to defy ban on Budapest Pride - CNN
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
PlayStation Plus new free game is the service's first 'AAAA' - GAMINGbible
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
First look: The new Pedro Pascal-narrated space show in NYC - Time Out
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.